Rick Cofer is a Texas-based attorney. He specializes in family domestic violence cases, juvenile charges, and drug cases to just mention a few. Rick Cofer graduated from the University of Texas at Austin in 2004 earning his Bachelor of Arts in History and Government. Later, at the same university, Rick Cofer earned his Doctor of Law (JD) degree in 2007.
As previously mentioned, Rick Cofer specializes in juvenile charges. In a recent article dated January 3rd of 2019, Rick Cofer gives his insights on why “juveniles confess to crimes they did not commit.” The beginning of the article states that whether a person is an adult or juvenile, getting arrested is a traumatizing event. For juveniles, the article states that “it is more traumatic”.
It then describes a crime scene where a juvenile boy is being questioned by police officers. The article describes the boy’s reaction as he surrounded by law enforcement officers. The story continues to describe the teenager and that his only thoughts are to “get away from the situation”. In doing so, he acts and says what he thinks the officers want to hear, even if it is not the truth. Ultimately, the story continues to describe the juvenile’s arrest and interrogation at the police station.
The article then moves on to advise parents to teach their children how to deal with unforeseen circumstances such as these. It says to teach your kids to, “always tell an officer who attempts to question them about a crime that they want to talk to a lawyer …” The article says that they encourage parents to this because “most officers have already decided that the person being interrogated is likely guilty …” It goes on to state that an interrogation is more likely to incriminate a person rather than to look for facts on the involvement of the person being interrogated.
Rick Cofer Comments
Further, in the article, Rick Cofer explains that “during an interrogation, there is often a presumption of guilt.” He says that questions asked by interrogators often lead to a coerced confession. In some cases, “suggestive” techniques are used by law enforcement that results in a “false confession” utilizing scare tactics.
If you would like to read the full article, please click here.
Most disputes are settled in court. The process of filing a complaint against a particular party is procedural. It has detailed steps that should be adhered. Failure to comply may lead to severe consequences on the individual involved. It is advisable for one to hire an attorney to assist them in filing a lawsuit. Karl Heideck pursued his Bachelor’s degree in Education at Swarthmore College. He graduated in 2003. He joined Templeton University School of Law in 2009 in pursuit of his dream of becoming a licensed litigator. Karl Heideck had his first work experience as an attorney in Philadelphia.
Karl Heideck became competent in filing client complaints, responding to complaints, and the entire litigation process including obtaining personal jurisdiction, filing motions, appeals, and responses for defendants during his period of professionalism as an attorney. Karl Heideck is a professional attorney who is based in Philadelphia. He specializes in litigation, compliance, and risk management.
Karl provides professional advice on laws that may have a potential impact on employers of specific companies at the federal and state level. He is also compassionate towards his clients. Karl ensures he understands their grievances so that he can represent them better in court. He provides a variety of legal services that relate to corporate law, employment regulation, commercial ordinances, and other similar legal codes.
Read more on Angel.co
Karl provides relevant information about the importance of the different forms of law and their compliance to the public through regular posting on his blog page. He recently handled the lawsuit that was made by the city of Philadelphia against Wells Fargo. The city of Philadelphia claimed that the Wells Fargo had violated the fair housing Act of 1968 by providing lending services to minority mortgage borrowers.
This lawsuit came after the supreme court of the United States made a ruling that Miami could file a lawsuit against the Bank of America and Wells Fargo under the fair housing Act. The same attorneys who represented Miami were appointed to represent Philadelphia in this case including Karl Heideck. He explained the lawsuit by evaluating the role of each party. He reviewed the allegations that were made by the city and stated that the bank made it difficult for local borrowers to refinance their mortgage. He further noted that the city had conducted an investigation to gather adequate evidence before filing the complaint. Karl Heideck will use his professional expertise and knowledge to establish the best way that he will represent the city of Philadelphia to ensure it wins the case.